Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 07:12

Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Have you ever had a secret crush on anyone?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why are the Chinese so sensitive to Western criticism?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
How do you handle family members who ask for handouts?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sonic Racing: CrossWorlds Officially Reveals Nickelodeon Collaboration - Nintendo Life
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump is forcing this dirty, costly coal plant to stay open - The Washington Post
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Carlie Irsay-Gordon explains her habit of wearing a headset during games - NBC Sports
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What happened in a tent while you were camping that you will never forget?